View Single Post
Old 08-30-2015, 06:12 AM
  #7  
rickair7777
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine View Post
That is no longer correct. If the automated system issued a report, the FAA can investigate it even if the controller didn't care or didn't even notice. Another common misconception is if ATC fails to correct your read back (IE, they clear you to 5,000 ft and you read back 3,000 ft and they don't say anything), you can also be violated for loss of separation.
Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
ATC is supposed to do certain things procedurally, but even if they forget or don't for some other reason, it doesn't change what happened in the first place. They don't have to say "possible pilot deviation", although they try to when it happens. NASA form is a good idea. Outcome is usually an Administrative Action Warning Notice. NASA form would waive the penalty (not the decision) if it went to a Legal Action, but that's rare for a simple pilot deviation. I believe the "alarm" ATC uses is 300', a good number to keep in the back of your head.

Mostly likely, if you haven't heard anything in a month, you probably won't hear about it at all. That's not an absolute, but it's usually the way it goes.
This checks with what I've been told by controllers. The automated system might flag you without the controller even being aware. I'm led to believe this only happens at certain designated fixes where they have a lot of issues (essentially red-light cameras), as opposed to constant monitoring of all assigned alts.
rickair7777 is offline