Originally Posted by
CloudSailor
And a refreshing answer would be "because the company likes to maintain that control over our scheduling abilities, and we conceded - regardless of the minimal capital expenditure required for this". Then, the Q&A session would actually be worth reading.
Yes. I agree. I can handle it more if they just answer the question honestly. Such as we failed to get this. It wasn't worth the fight. The company dug in too hard. We didn't think it was important enough. We needed to work on other things. This was a compromise because the company wouldn't budge etc.
Bottom line is that "political", evasive, or " appeasing " answers evoke a lack of trust. I WANT to trust our guys