Originally Posted by
pipe
I have worked under a PBS program. My spouse has worked under two of them.
The quality and integrity of the schedules produced is entirely dependent upon who controls the many switches and parameters within the program.
Anytime the word control is introduced into the FDX discussion, I think we know how that turns out for us.
Pipe
You quote me as if I need to be told this. I'm no advocate for PBS and never will be.
Simply attempting to answer a previous question. Maybe you need to go back a few posts.
I don't know enough about the secondary changes in the TA to have an opinion about that. I need interpretation because at first glance it looks like lots of stuff is TBD which doesn't seem like a good idea with this company historically.
Our current secondary process has always been AFU. If they can make it better, great. I'd just like to know exactly how before I agree to anything.