Originally Posted by
Xdashdriver
You flatly refuse and the company wins by saving nearly $15m over the next 5 years. JO steamrolls you more by your flatly refusing. Now if you're refusing because you believe we could get more by negotiating over the next 5 years, then vote no. Don't flatly refuse because somehow you think you're sticking it to the man, because he won't feel any pain over it.
Most of the cost in the TA is due to the elimination of base pay correct? What incentive do FOs have to vote this TA in?
Some things in the reserve language are better. However, there is nothing that locks the company into doing anything a particular way. If they choose to avoid LCR then they can. If they don't want reserves to pick up open time they can change buffers. So what exactly is worth voting on aside from the captains getting base pay eliminated?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk