I don't think they are lying. And I appreciate their work. I think they did their best, but I think we can do better. Hopefully, we vote this thing down and form a new committee.

Have you ever heard a NC say they left millions on the table after they made a deal? If so, why did they make the deal? Have you ever seen deals improve after turning down a TA?

What did the Delta negotiators say? "It's a crap deal, but I'm asking you to vote for it anyway?" No, they said it was the best they could get. And I believe that our committee felt the same. But there are many of us that think the deal is sub par and it needs to be improved. It's at least a six year deal? Why sign a weak TA and have to live with it this long?

Let's get a new team in, regroup and work on a suitable deal. So what if it takes a year or two?