Originally Posted by
CloudSailor
No, but it is extremely likely the company has some different 'tweaks' to the TA depending on the outcome of a rejected TA (from a very good source).
If were rejected by 90%, a very different tweak, than if it is rejected by 51%. But, to your point, why are we rushing to take this out of fear of it taking longer to achieve a true industry-leading TA?
This is for us to live with for 10 years! I can wait through peak, which would probably be very ugly (not something I want BTW, nor the company obviously). Why this rush to settle for something substandard just because we won't get a deal quickly if we reject it???
You are making a strawman argument. I dont think this deal is substandard. I think we could get improvements, but I think it will be mostly moving the money around, I dont think we will recover the money we lost over the 2 years it will take. You do.