Thread: Litigation news
View Single Post
Old 09-15-2015 | 08:41 AM
  #10  
beancounter's Avatar
beancounter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 385
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by dynap09
Looks like APA opposes injunction against APA (no surprise). They also oppose injunction against east merger committee.

US Airways also opposed injunction against APA.

Wonder if west might need to focus on just the east merger committee? That seems a more reasonable position - just focus on east's history and see if they can get a narrowly drawn injunction against east.
The APA response doesn't surprise me, they're looking out for the legacy APA pilots. Whether there was a valid/legal arbitration or not, they would rather have a sixty year old ahead of one of their pilots as opposed to a fifty year old. That's fine, I was expecting that.

What would give me pause as a west pilot though is the company's response. In the past they've been pretty spot on. If you choose to listen to what they say, the choice is: drop the injunction and let things proceed, the west has a seat at the table, or risk years of delay. Hmmmmmm, just something to think about......not that anyone gives a $%^& about what I think (east, LAA, or west).
Reply