Originally Posted by
FlameNSky
Oh, that's right. I knew there was a 35% in there somewhere. I guess when AAG takes control of the defunct E175 that RAH cannot staff, it won't take us long to get the 40th E175.
I guess, I am not even a good envoy salesman.
I've said it before, IF RAH had to stop some flying due to staffing, WHY would they stop the AAG 175 flying when they've said that is their goal (large RJ)? Wouldn't it make sense to park their not-175 flying?
The only large RJs that AAG will own end in NN.