Originally Posted by RockyMtMadDog

So if fraudulent proxies made a difference in the outcome, you consider that a red herring? And the 66 chair ignored the complaints of those who witnessed the activity. Fail.

Originally Posted by RockyMtMadDog

If proxies were being assigned on the fly, then it was a violation of the constitution and bylaws, and those proxies should have been invalidated by a chairman who was more interested in ending the meeting than anything else.

Originally Posted by sailingfun

That is correct. At the Atlanta meeting several pilots put ballots in for pilots who had left the meeting. They knew they shouldn't have but did it anyway. My fellow pilots amaze me at times. They did get called on it and the requirements were reiterated for the next 3 votes with more observation.