Originally Posted by
FirstClass
Money is not the issue, scope is. There is no amount of money that can buy scope back. The TA cannot be allowed to pass with scope changes.
This is why we need to think "post No" vote.
There's two big camps of no voters.
1. We need more money in lieu of the scope changes we're allowing.
2. We want the scope clause from the previous contract.
My informal poll is that we have No voters who are at cross purpose here.