Originally Posted by
RockyMtMadDog
Hey, don't worry about me. I am in good financial shape. I am simply pointing out what is known in philosophical circles as the 'Fallacy of Carl.'
P.S. I don't want to fly more, but I'd love to get paid more for the flying I do. And I can't think of a single big, bad work rule that would have burdened me.
Net value: $1.1B+. That's my point.
We both seem to be well off, good for us! Knowing that then 8% would have never made a difference to us. I dont like to fly more either, so I dont.
The concessions riddled in TA1, would not have effected me either. So basically we have 2 things in common now.
Where we do not agree on is this:
1) $1.1 billion dollar value of TA1..Complete and utter BS. We have gone through this before about the loose definition of "VALUE" when it comes to marketing and sales pitch.
2) In a Union, its not about me or I. Its about the "whole-group". 65% of our brothers read into TA1 and determined it was a PILE of POOP.
So now, we have to move forward. You keep on bringing up TA1 and this does no good. The majority spoke.
Thank you.
TEN