Originally Posted by
A320Flyer
Agreed. But at least, in my view, they weren't trying to blow smoke up our arses about how nice and cooperative management is. I'd never envision the "old guys" answering phones in SOC to please the COO and in exchange of goodwill. FUPM!
Weren't blowing smoke? YGTBSM! The same group that said if you vote no, we are in no-man's land? The same group that showed us a TA 3 weeks after we went back to work? Same group that showed their technical competence by not including a contingency in the back to work agreement about what happens if there was a no vote? Or was that planned as leverage to use against us?