I save that special place the the Master of Wah!

(I actually have agreed with him once or twice, but I may have been drinking at the time)

In my mind, there's more legit reasons to vote no. It clouds the real arguments to bring up the PBS red herring.

As the previous posters have testified, PBS is a non starter with SWAPA. I'll agree to meet and talk all they want...the answer is still NO.

Subsets? That concerns me.

Sec 1? That concerns me, but I think I trust the language.

retro v bonus. Still trying to figure out that math.

Retirement? I was hoping for more. Not sure if it's a total deal breaker yet.

I'm concerned that the wing of the SWAPA BOD that is trying to throw a coup is also the same group that doesn't trust it's own pilots to listen to the unions own paid industry analyst and is the loudest, angriest NO contingent.

"pick up my guitar and play...Just like yesterday
Then I'll get on my knees and pray
We don't get fooled again"