Originally Posted by
Laughing_Jakal
You may see it as courageous. I see it as simply pragmatic. I voted yes for reasons obvious enough to me. I ran a personal cost/benefit analysis and came to a "yes", by a small margin.
That same logic could be used for justifying many things like flying draft, AVA, etc.
I ran another analysis and found out this doesn't advance our profession, is mostly self-funded with productivity gains, is a win for the company and erodes our QOL on many levels. This is my last contract. I could take the money and run but that isn't the legacy I want to leave.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD