View Single Post
Old 10-16-2015, 04:53 AM
  #2  
Flybywyr
Line Holder
 
Flybywyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 52
Default

Originally Posted by iarapilot View Post
The TA has many new things that increase productivity due to our low staffing. In addition to the dont get sick or take vacation scheme, you have some others also.

There is new language relating to VTOs, and to extra pay when extended etc. When you have vacation you can now elect to not use all those days. The retirement hasnt increased, so that in the short term, some might decide to stay longer. There are other areas that also increase productivity, directly or indirectly.

The reason I point this out is because I wonder how bad their staffing model shows that peak, and beyond, might be a problem. And if we are really short to cover the next 2 months, what would a no vote do to entice the Company for a better deal?

Just thinking out loud, but I believe that we might have more bargaining power than we think. That is JMO, so for those that would give a counter argument, I have heard them already.

Just flying my schedule, or less, over the holidays to be home with family.
I voted no. If the TA1 is voted down I have no expectation that it will be less than 2 years for TA2. If it is sooner all the better, but that's what I have planned for. The company will get through peak one way or another. It will get ugly, we will get extended "rerouted" and swept, even if the TA passes. FedEx will flush the instructors back and they can involuntarily cancel vacations. When I was in MIA I met some Atlas pilots, they were training in the Boeing 767 sims down there. They told me FedEx is shopping to see how much lift they can provide for peak.
Flybywyr is offline