Originally Posted by
PDTpilotXX
We're on a 2 year plan to up our staffing then begin to transition 175's here from RAH. So saying I'm wrong is all you can do until it plays out. Here's an idea... take a look at the changes to the RAH scope and successorsship language changes in their TA. That was no accident.
AAG has made a big deal of single-type fleets at their wholly-owneds. PSA got the CRJs, Envoy got the 175s. So why on earth would they put 175s at Piedmont when they could put them at Envoy (and, if they need to, send more of Envoy's 145s over to Piedmont)?
The changes to the RAH scope and successorship language applies just as easily to moving those planes to Envoy as it does to moving them to Piedmont.