Originally Posted by
Left Handed
This is a pro MEC ratify statement. You called it important, and said for them to go ahead and make that tough decision because thats what their position entails.
I would never have said 'go ahead if they think it's important' if I was against it. I would have said "They better not be thinking about MEC ratify" if it was me. If that was not your intent, then I misread your post.
For the record, what do you think about MEC ratify? Are you for or against it?
I thought someone would have jumped on the 'membership must vote on all issues effecting pay' resolution that I've heard about yet never made it into the policy manual.