Originally Posted by
Left Handed
This is a pro MEC ratify statement. You called it important, and said for them to go ahead and make that tough decision because thats what their position entails.
I would never have said 'go ahead if they think it's important' if I was against it. I would have said "They better not be thinking about MEC ratify" if it was me. If that was not your intent, then I misread your post.
For the record, what do you think about MEC ratify? Are you for or against it?
You would have said...... That's nice, but you are you, and I'm not you.
Read it again, and include the sentence that followed in your consideration. Also, my comment was in response to someone else's point that the MEC might well try to tell us that we had only a short window of opportunity to accept the deal. To which I said "Originally Posted by*skybolt*
Or what? Be left in "no mans land"?*
If it's that important, let them MEC ratify. They all wanted, fought for, the positions of responsibility, let them have the cojones to make the tough decision.
"
That my friend is a challenge to the "leadership" to step up to the plate if they consider it necessary. Last time, they hid behind our skirts. Ask Ramrod for specific details, the short story is that we were sent back to work after our strike without a ratified TA, and essentially told that we had to accept their deal. They gave us no choice, then hid behind the fact that 74% of the pilots voted yes.