Originally Posted by
Purple Drank
TAANSTAFL. Is that dalpa's new code word for "cost neutral?" We have to pay for our own improvements?
Gmafb
No it doesn't have to be cost neutral (and shouldn't be!) but the idea that trading PS for pay is a one time good deal isn't necessarily true either. Any future pay increases on a percentage basis are by definition worth more if the baseline number starts out as a higher value.
(I don't advocate a one for one trade either)