Originally Posted by svergin

The entire idea was to prove a point. We keep talking about how we will get these improvements "next time". Well we didn't get them in C2012, we didn't get them in this TA, so what makes you think a NO vote will result in getting them on the next one.

Yes, there is risk in accepting this TA. There is also risk in not accepting this TA.

In 2 years we could have a terrible economy and be losing money when we open contract negotiations. We could also be making $8B per year in profits and glad that we weren't still locked into 4 more years of C2016.