Why does it necessarily have to go away?

I actually buy the argument that some put out there that the low pay on the E190 would cause a constant bidding off of the equipment and coupled with the 1 year seat lock, would cost a ton of money in training cycles.

Wouldn't raising the E190 pay to 717 pay, or even 88 pay, solve a lot of the problems associated with a 1 year seat lock causing too many training cycles?

It actually seems like it shouldn't cost DALPA anything to raise E190 pay to where it should be, since it would help the company with the alleviating training cycles.