Originally Posted by
Skyvector
eaglefly you are talking about a change in culture, which is subjective. The guy said that AA-the implication being AAG-is untrustworthy and does not keep promises. I ask for specific examples. Saying that the much anticipated culture change at AA has yet to occur is not an example. That is subjective and open to interpretation. Cite specific examples of a promise made that was subsequently broken. In particular as it relates to Envoy. Otherwise, this argument is over as I'm not going to get into yet another "spin the wheels in the mud" match with eaglefly.
But I DID provide an example of AAG not keeping promises. I stated they they are dragging their feet and stalling out pilot beneficial contractual components and implementing self-beneficial ones. One claim involves "computer issues", but many issues requiring that don't seem to impede company beneficial provisions. I'm just going on what APA is saying, so it isn't just me. Aside from specific examples involving Envoy, why is that necessary if one shows that promises are broken elsewhere by the same source ?
Do you think Envoy is "special" in Parker's eye's somehow, more so then AA ?
Originally Posted by
Skyvector
I don't like Parker anymore than the next guy. But he and the rest of the US Airways team are far and away better than what we had previously under AMR. And it pains me to say that because it puts me in a position of having to defend them every time someone mistakes AAG with AMR. Airline managers are all scum and in my opinion out of touch with the realities of flying the line. But to say that AAG hasn't been keeping their promises is inaccurate.
Saying that AAG is untrustworthy because AMR was untrustworthy is disingenuous at best, ignorant at worst.
My opinions have nothing to do with Parker personally, just connecting the dots on an entity that from most views here talked-the-talk, but has yet to walk-the-walk in regard to what they implied we could expect at the "new" AA. Again, if they aren't meeting that litmus here, why should anyone believe they intend to do that there in the future ?
AFAIC, anyone who makes that assumption based on the present view outside the front windscreen here or there, I consider disingenuous at best and ignorant at worst.