Originally Posted by
FlameNSky
Claims to that effect have no legal or logical (business) sense to support it. They are simply saying what they hope will happen without any logical argument to support it.
Oh I'm well aware of this, as is anyone with half a brain. I just would really love to see what basis for an argument those that would love to see envoy fail have to support there claim. The argument "it's not a judges arbitration so it can and will likely be violated" is obviously someone grasping at straws who really does have a bone to pick with the envoy pilot group, for whatever reason that may be.