Honest question - why are the c2012 pay rates for the E190 equal to the CRJ9? The E195 then has a significant paybump above the E190. This makes no sense - the CRJ9 is equivalent to an E175. Is there a lack of small airplane size recognition in the DALPA ranks?

Hope to see this resolved in C2016.

Small aircraft single class passenger counts:
CRJ7/ERJ170/MRJ70 = 70-80
CRJ9/ERJ175/MRJ90 = 88-90
ERJ190 =110
ERJ195/CS100/B717 = 120

I understand that we don't fly these in single class configuration - the numbers are just here for apples to apples comparison to illustrate the size and capacity differences between these aircraft.