Originally Posted by
jcountry
That's not what was implied in the email (or in what the neg chairman said at the BOD meeting.)
He is quoted as saying something to the effect of "LUS pilots are being paid incorrectly-due to their date of hire." As you know, LUS never used an "occupational date." That was strictly an LAA thing. At LUS, the seniority date was only one thing. There were never two separate dates.
I too have expressed my concerns to the reps. I have not heard any real clarification either.
Sure looks to me like they are trying to apply the JCBA retroactively. The contracts we were hired under do not have the term "occupational date" anywhere I can find. I see no provision for anything other than the one seniority date.
I sure would like to see something in writing which applies this logic to LUS people hired pre-JCBA. Looks to me like a very creative interpretation of a document which didn't exist at that point. In other words-I see no other position for this other than an attempt at a retroactive application of something that didn't exist for over a year for some people.
APA wants to change our seniority date to mesh with their new hires except they also want to take money out of our hands. Pretty f'ed up representation.
I'm all for a fair meshing of the groups, US guys on property after the AA guys shouldn't go in front of them, but there should be a better way of doing it vs. taking money out of the represented pilots hands.
And if you do it for us, you'd need to do it for the entire US pilot group as well.