Originally Posted by
jsled
Totally bogus argument. Go read section 3-J of the UPA. It's on page 38.
3-J-1-c The negotiations shall attempt to find a pay rate and Equipment banding that is consistent with the pay rates and Equipment banding of existing Equipment types. If such negotiations do not result in agreement within 100 days from the date this procedure is invoked, either party may submit the dispute to final and binding interest arbitration.
How is it bogus? If you agree to the rate in this TA then 3-J-1-c is not used. How do you justify the CS100 paying $50 an hour less then the CS300 or A319?