View Single Post
Old 12-27-2015 | 09:15 AM
  #22  
AllenAllert
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gettinbumped
Which if it passes by a large margin is exactly why the politics on the MEC is so toxic. If the MEC roll call is 50.1% and the actual pilots vote it in by 75%, then is the MEC REALLY doing what the pilots are saying they want done?? My reps both voted no and in a statement said that one of the reasons why is that the TA didn't follow MEC direction because there were no reserve changes and the NC and MC (wisely if you ask me) decoupled the New Narrowbody discussion from the agreement to avoid the shiny jet syndrome. So the question I will pose to them is if the majority of pilots in your council vote FOR the deal and you both voted against, are YOU following COUNCIL direction? I think not. We will see when the final vote is tallied.

As I've said before, I hate the way the MEC does business. 2 pilots speak for 1500 with no effective way to guage the pulse of their constituents. 20 pilots choose the MC. Hate the methodology
Obviously, you don't understand why the system was constructed in this manner. GUM, CLE deserve a seat, just as EWR,IAH, ORD,...... at the big table and deserve to have an equal vote. I know somebody has told you this before or at least you read it somewhere before. Think - GB.
Reply