Originally Posted by
Flytolive
Nobody 'removed it.' The company's efforts to complete an order fell through and the MEC voted to ignore that and the reserve improvement parts of their own direction.
Dude, back up your claims or stop talking.
And btw, the MEC direction was to DISCUSS those bullet points (and only those bullet points). They were discussed and beared no fruit...that is the most troubling part of the con letter for me; The pushing of this talking point that makes NO difference to what we are looking at.
That and A.C. claiming that a "TA" wasn't reached by the deadline, only an AIP. I respect the dissent that can argue based on merit...