Originally Posted by
Andy
His response was ambiguous enough that I wasn't sure if he caught my sarcasm; I gave him the benefit of the doubt.
My only concern was the CAL reference - we need to leave this particular division behind - we are now all one company and one union. Infighting this many years after the merger is counterproductive for all of us. It shouldn't matter if you're LCAL, LUAL, or a postmerger hire.
I did get the sarcasism
The UAL v CAL will take 30-40 years to go away
See : Republic v NWA , DL v Western and DL v NWA
Unfortunately