Originally Posted by
RedeyeAV8r
You forget that the GT limits have already been waived.
We already agreed to allow over 3 hours GT between HKG and SZX. I do that quite often. It is a pain but again the alternative is to live in CAN.
Is this preferable?
You will be getting paid for the GT even though it is a long duty and It actually might limit what the company can do to to you on the First night out and the last night in because of the added duty.
Also it will limit the companys ability for short reserve call out. I would also assume that the trips will be Week on Week off style because of the long GT.
It would be grossly-inefficient to build mulitiple departure line departures with 3 1/2-4 hourr GT's every other night.
So do you propose we the Domicle in CAN? That is what the company wanted to do initially.
STV is the only concession in the LOA. If this LOA fails .do you think your tax savings will equal the loss of $2700 month?
I guess we can just have a gentlmenly disagreement.
"
We already agreed to allow over 3 hours GT between HKG and SZX."
This is not a blanket waiver! It's case by case and has to be approved by our SIG.
As for STV being the only concession in the LOA. Even if this were true, which I do not believe it is, why is
any concession OK?
As far as the company wanting to open the
Domicile in CAN. Let them. We'll see what happens. By the way, it's not a Domicile, it's a FDA. There's a difference.