Originally Posted by
flyinawa
I'm sure all involved parties read their own representative's interpretations of each day's events. I have no doubt every group said, "We killed that guy on the stand today" and "the arbs totally got it when we ran through our slides". There is no such thing as a neutral party so I'm content to just let the "web experts" explain what's going to happen without responding. While I'm waiting for the results, I read the transcripts and draw my own conclusions about possible outcomes.
Just going on transcripts myself as well. I recall reading both some East and West assessments (East reps and Leonidas), but haven't found or read specific comment by AAPSIC on their interpretations of anything outside their testimony. Have I missed something or is there comment by them somewhere in addition to the transcripts ?