View Single Post
Old 01-27-2016, 07:12 PM
  #25  
JohnBurke
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,021
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Global/national geographic average elevations don't reflect where people actually live. They don't live on mountain tops at all, and they tend to concentrate near oceans and rivers (ease of transport way back in the day).

From the naval power projection perspective, a large majority of the global population lives very close (helicopter/strike fighter range) to an ocean.

I'm pretty confidant that the average elevation of the global population is well under 1000', probably within a few hundred feet of sea level.

The average elevation of air travelers actually may be a bit higher...folks in the boondocks may have more need/desire to travel.
Being obtuse, or you really don't get it?

You do understand that this is about cabin pressurization and not where people actually live, right?

Again, for those too slow to read the first few times, you're welcome to do the math city by city and find the actual population at sea level if you wish, but it's really irrelevant to the fact that there's no economic benefit to pressurizing cabins to sea level, nor is there a particular need given that such a large percentage of the worlds population doesn't actually live at sea level.

You go ahead and spend your evening coming up with better numbers, if it's that important to you. Until then, put up or shut up...and do try to stick with the subject of the thread, will you?
JohnBurke is offline