View Single Post
Old 02-05-2016 | 02:54 PM
  #54  
TonyC's Avatar
TonyC
Organizational Learning 
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,948
Likes: 0
From: Directly behind the combiner
Default

Originally Posted by Full pull

So using AADs instead of AMJs increases the volume 10%.

Or 10% less, depending on which loading configuration is used on " some" A300-600s.

I provided details about A300/A310 loading because Full pull claimed you could put 2 AADs in the place of 1 AMJ, which is clearly not the case. I fail to see, however, how any discussion of Airbus loading has anything to do with the claims made by Global Western that an MD-11 is better than a B-767 for hauling freight.

I believe someone (Perm11FO) said their claims amounted to "putting lipstick on a pig". I'm still waiting to hear facts to substantiate such rhetoric.






.
Reply