Originally Posted by
WakeWash
I disagree. If they change it in the next few months there will be no problem. Reason for saying this is because just look at the march lines. We are still slightly overstaffed, and they could easily build much more efficient lines. If they do this they will have no issue going another few months on the pilots currently on property. I do agree, however, that if they don't do anything soon, then there will be a big issue. PSA, Envoy, and PDT management are puppets though. AAG sees the numbers concerning everything. They know the issues. They came down on payroll and scheduling back when delays from crew swaps and pay discrepancies were incredibly high. They know the hiring issues happening at the WOs. Ultimately it's up to them to pony up and fix the issue.
I agree they are puppets and this is all up to AAG to fix.
My crystal ball assumptions are based off the claim of 10.5 pilots per aircraft. That gives us 15% buffer. I gladly welcome more efficient schedules and it seems like March is a hint. TYS actually had decent time lines with more than 11 days off. I'm certainly no expert. The bandaid of efficient schedules might be enough only if it occurs with something to actually attract pilots.