Old 08-01-2007, 11:30 PM
  #4  
RedeyeAV8r
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

Originally Posted by DLax85 View Post
If you are a "No" voter --- yes it already is too low.

If you are a "Yes" voter --- it clearly isn't.

The question is "How low will you go?"

It's been asserted the "No" voters are greedy. They want too much.

What I am trying to ascertain is how "generous" are the "Yes" voters?

Is their generosity to the company's profits boundless?

Is there a cornerstone aspect of this LOA, that if removed, would make them change their vote to "No"?

If the "No" voters are being asked to reconsider their positions, I think it is equally as important for the "yes" voters to articulate what aspect of the LOA put them "over the top" and convinced them to vote "Yes".

So, once again -- "Yes" voters --- How low will you go?
Again I caution you. If this LOA does fail ( as it appears likely) is it really prudent to request lower numbers some are willing to accept? Why would you want to give MGT, who obviously have lurkers here, lower numbers?

Wouldn't you agree?
RedeyeAV8r is offline