Originally Posted by
Jaxman187
I get you DLax. Your questions are simply rhetorical in nature, in order to have "yes" voters to ponder the low ball nature of this LOA that they support. I appreciate the time you put into coming up with these questions.
I agree with you too, DLAX. I wish I got paid to disagree with REDEYE because I almost always do.
If the LOA fails because it sucks (AND it does), why would someone saying they would have taken less help the company? If it fails, they were already a minority opinion?
Let's consider the numbers. Assume 50% +1 voters vote this down. Now assume for the sake of argument that 20(an astronomically high number for this board) yes voters chime in that they would accept paying their own way, no allowances, no equalization, and alimony for all of Fred's children. What does the company do with that??
I assumed the questions were rhetorical anyway.