Thread: B-21 to replace B-52
View Single Post
Old 02-29-2016 | 09:37 AM
  #21  
PNWFlyer
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 149
Default
Originally Posted by SayAlt
From a cost standpoint, I don't get this. Doesn't the B-2 already do this?

Air Force unveils first image of B-21 long-range bomber - Washington Times
Yes, the B-2 does already do this. Problem is the B-2s can't stay flying much longer. The B-21 is replacing the B-2, not the B-52. The B-52 will be flying long after the last B-21 is sent to the scrap yard.

Titanium works great until it doesn't!
Reply
0