I don't think that's just mil candidates. Seems like it's simply an emerging trend of those being selected.

I'm sure SOMEONE is going to say that "well, all the best candidates are take and that's why it seems more are failing the HPI blah blah blah blah blah......." I don't buy that. I also thought that with the switch from CV to BK in charge, some parameters and criteria were altered/changed.

Because we ALL KNOW "that guy/those guys", you know, "THAT GUY/THOSE GUYS" that were hired early on in 2013 that was OTS and somehow got through it and everyone is scratching their head.

Anybody got any of the recent stats on HPI pass/fail? Seems I've heard it's trended as high as a 50/50 split but no clue.

And although it's FACT that UAL took a sampling of UCH pilots and gave them the HPI to determine the parameters and bounds to determine a successful candidate, it's hypotholated/speculatized that some get a "sliding scale".

The rest of you b1tching about a guard "slot", YOU'RE ON GUARD!!!!!!!!!!