View Single Post
Old 03-07-2016 | 08:09 AM
  #41  
Scoop
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,238
Likes: 81
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by Falcon7
Retro pay is negotiated, some airlines get it, some get signing bonuses worth pennies on the dollars for the years spent negotiating. We want 22% on the amendable date, and 7% thereafter. Are you suggesting that if we go the standard two years in mediation we will get a minimum of 40% on date of signing and full retro to the amendable date of 22, 7, 7?

You talk about precedent in 1998 NWA was a measly 3.5% retro back to 1996 after a strike in 1998. At Delta in 2001 it wasn't much better for most at only 3.8%.

I am not suggesting any such thing which is why this is what I posted:

"This helps to minimize any financial benefits the company may achieve by dragging things out for years."

But after reading some of your posts I really don't think you care what anybody posts - you are apparently trip wired to see everything through the eyes of someone that feels slighted and is unjustly missing out on a 8.5% raise with the rejected TA.

Please realize that the TA did not fail because of Team Orange (whoever that is) Anit-Moakists, the bogeyman or the DPA. The TA failed because 66% of your fellow Pilots found it lacking.

Mostly the very same Pilots that passed C-2012 by an overwhelming percentage, so perhaps if you really want a better contract you should start focusing some of your energy on the future instead of fixating on the failed TA of the past.


Scoop
Reply