Originally Posted by
Skyvector
It's you guys who are being selective with your facts. Point out how the company has been flowing consistently since taking over from AMR. Talk about 100% flows for most of 2015. 30/month for 2016. That doesn't jive with your selective arguments, does it? Pick anyone of those grievances...none of them are indicative of the flow through. Cat 2? Really? The CBT pay? RAP1 stuff?
Again, most of you will cry and moan all the way up until the moment you flow yourself. Then it's all smiles for the camera, pictures of your AA wings, and so on.
Individually they don't equal a stoppage of the flow obviously. But the sheer number of them is indicative of how the management treats us and the contract. So one has to wonder how management would treat us if we get to a critical staffing situation. If we dont work out a reserve agreement then management chooses to unilaterally do the RAP 1 roll out, then it is reasonable to assume that if staffing becomes critical that management could unilaterally impose something that is damaging to the flow. It is a logical thought process.