Originally Posted by
eaglefly
I would ask you to please provide the math that backs up your assertions. You are arguing a position based on "factual data", so for the benefit of all, please provide yours. Personally, I think his estimate is a bit long, but yours is too short. The only thing they both share are that they are uncertain projections as there are too many unidentified variables possible to make either projection a certainty.
Again, for everyone's benefit, please substantiate the projection of a flow to AA for the pilots in the last class to be at AA in
less then 6 years or Charlie Bucket from last May. This is not trolling and accurate info has nothing to do with "doom and gloom", so continuing to beat that dead horse serves no purpose. You refused my last request and leveled the same baseless claims at me and I'm hoping for a little more success this time.
Of course..............if this is "April Fools" on everyone here, then you got me !
What's your opinion on Envoy reaching the "critical staffing" level that I've been discussing? Do you think that AA will follow in United/Delta's footsteps and bring more current regional flying to mainline OR do they double down on keeping three WO's, a "portfolio" of other regional feed and sticking with the plan they've had all along?
If it's the latter, I see no way that Envoy can flow more than just a few a month with the tepid numbers of new hires that have been showing up.