Thread: Skywest v2.0
View Single Post
Old 04-23-2016 | 05:34 PM
  #881  
disillusioned
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ellen
Sounds like horrible SAPA leadership to censor communication, stinks of a power play if you ask me, sorry.

Do you elect these MEC-type people to represent you or does the company pick them for you? Because, I'd have trouble believing any pilot group would elect someone that would censor pilot communication whether good or bad. That's just wrong.
My opinion only, our pilot group is apathetic. One former SAPA president was very upfront with our pilot group. The company tried to limit his communication and our former VP of FO asked that all communication to the pilots go through him to be approved before it was sent to the pilots. Our SAPA President refused and lost access to send emails from the company email to the pilot group.

The only time you will see a push on elections is when SAPA is worried about someone running that may rock the boat. Most of our rep elections are very low turnout because people realize that nothing can get done and eventually all our good SAPA reps get burned out and quit the company or being a rep. I personally feel there are several things our current SAPA Pres and EB have done things that should lead to a recall. Changing the ability to have new hires vote (during a pay package vote that gave them a substantial raise), censoring our forums, and trying to give the company the ability to reflow our pilots via our EFB are just a couple that come to mind. As you pointed out with the above examples, you don't dare speak up for fear of retaliation. In fact, we had a recent SAPA rep that was very critical of the company and called them and SAPA out regularly. He was labeled as a troublemaker and subsequently fired.

Originally Posted by andili61
One more thing, is it true that Skywest is trying to get ExpressJet out of business? (That's the rumor)
Inc wanted to get ASA and XJT combined, but surprisingly XJT didn't want to give up the good parts of their contract. From my source in SGU, they simply said fine, we just won't give them anymore flying. I don't think they are trying to get XJT out of business but they sure as seem like they would rather give the flying to the side of the house that doesn't have work rule protections. We get paid on some made up number called credit if we come in under block, they can award us 90+ hours each month with minimum days off and SGU uses their creative version of reflow to extend us into days off because it is still the original flight number. There are some good things about SW like the crews and the fact that BB is not the President of our company. But there is an ugly side that the kool aid drinkers refuse to acknowledge.

The simple fact is that INC is giving the flying to the cheap side of the house. ASA/XJT is being whipsawed by someone under their same INC umbrella. There is a reason that INC fought so hard against integrating our pilot groups.