Originally Posted by squall line

So the 321neo supposedly has a 500nm greater range than the max. Could this be a game changer for Alaska? I would think 500 miles is a lot when considering growth outside of where we already are. Or provide greater reliability on ETOPS flights when the headwinds are crazy. While I do think AS would prefer a single type, and the 737 seems to make the most sense, it would be foolish to count out the Airbus if it truly has better numbers than the Boeing.