Originally Posted by
iceman49
F7, anyway you cut it you are only talking about 1 person, don't think 1 person or 1 base would topple the negotiation....are you saying he is so persuasive everyone else is unable to move the argument in a different direction or is their position unreasonable? Let the process play out.
Bingo.
Harwood wrote that to go after Bartels for one simple reason: He believes (and has convinced others) that Bartels ran a "misinformation" campaign and without him, the TA wouldn't have failed. There is nothing more to it than that.
Harwood is the token snake in the grass sore loser. His product got shot down, and he wants a scapegoat. Freaking pathetic. He can't accept that he under delivered and what was going to happen happened. He cannot accept that he failed...after all, he is the smartest man in the room.
Bartels is one vote. One. TA 2015 failed in an unprecedented manner for one reason: it was a poor product.