Originally Posted by
ERflyer
I think they and most everyone wants the current MEC to succeed. What the above are attempting to do is drive the debate in a direction that will actually make a deal possible. Somewhere between C2015 which obviously failed, and Counter 2015 which obviously will never come to complete fruition.
There is a middle ground for a deal between both positions. Having the MEC fail helps no one and hurts everyone.
Curly and Harwood make it abundantly clear that they want the current admin to fail to prove that they were right with TA2015. This is about narcissism, not success.