Originally Posted by
Ameriagle
It's not an argument about terminology, it's a statement about credibility.
Oh ok. That sounds much better.
Since 4 say EFCA, and 2-3 say no EFCA, suddenly it's a credibility attack?! (Why don't you direct this 'critical' discussion to your training folks?)
I would have thought battle stances would have been drawn over topics that were more pertinent to the real issues facing the pilots. Oh, I don't know, maybe contract, safety...
Nope. Arguing over EFCA. What makes it even more amusing is that you apparently almost suffered a major mishap because of garbage maintenance...and pilots are 'swordfighting' over proper terminology. Wow. For a minute I thought I was on one of the regional boards.
MG must be pleased.