Originally Posted by
None
Let see here, I have only posted since joining on this thread. Most of it engaged with your nonsense. Yet you have now magically been able to determine who I have or have not flown for.
Ok so let me treat you accordingly. I have not stated who I have flown for or who I fly for. How you need to interpret that fact is you have no clue who I have flown for or who I fly for currently.
I said I flew parts 91,135, and 121. What that means is I could have flown for any 121 carrier or I could still be flying for a 121 carrier. It also means I could have flown for any 135 carrier or still be flying for a 135 carrier. It also means I could have flown for any part 91 operator or could still be flying for a part 91 operator.
See how that works? That is how the adults read and comprehend.
As I said earlier clearly not a proffesional aviator.
You could be a part 91 DFW GV driver, a part 121 allegiant MD-80 FO, an ex-Eagle pilot or a journeyman part 135 operator who's been above FL420. Do you know what connects all of those? Your awful grammar and writing style along with your disdain for Envoy based on how your tenure there likely ended. Keep writing paragraphs though. Your endless incoherent ranting continues to make my point.