View Single Post
Old 06-23-2016 | 08:07 AM
  #3490  
eaglefly
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by airlinegypsy
Is this aimed at the pilots or management? Because this is not the pilots problem to fix. Opening a MIA 175 base will likely not solve any of the staffing issues we have. And when it doesn't let's see what else management comes up with.
It's not "aimed" at anyone.

I'm simply stating my opinions regarding some at Envoy who think any announcement of a MIA E-175 base will automatically provide substantial benefit to either the present pilots or to altering Envoy's present path. Again, IF it does happen (and that's a big if), it depends on who Envoy management targets for the benefit. Either new-hires or present pilots, either currently qualified or maybe not, but not likely both. If a new domicile is opened in MIA, it's likely Envoy management wants it for their interests, whereas AAG might find it to the overall advantage of the operation to place those A/C at ORD.

It would be more expensive to put them at MIA as the domicile start-up costs have to be included with local management staffing, adequate facilities and of course potential training costs to allow present pilots to bid a "new status". It might be better to place them at ORD, which would get another 100 new-hires and open a satellite domicile in MIA with smaller E-145's to benefit a handful of present Envoy pilots which I hear ALPA has all but agreed to even though many pilots are against it.

Again, even with both, it's but a temporary hiccup distracting from the primary terminal illness and it isn't even a hiccup yet.
Reply