Originally Posted by
Falcon7
At DAL, despite some "no" voting reps promising an immediate return to the table, it took us 5-months to reengage with management. Now, a year after rejection, we still don't have a TA.
The new Admin says we are making progress and should have a deal this summer, but then in the next breath they tell us that they've achieved no agreements on pay, work rules, scope or any of the big ticket items.
Lots of hotheads promised a quick turn, one even said we'd get a better deal in 48 hours, some "no" voting reps promised us up to 3% whenever the non contracts get a raise (that was false, we got zero). At DAL we have not seen a single nickle of negotiated improvements one year after the rejection. As a result of our "no" vote we went from the highest paid legacy to the lowest. On the bright side, we'll have 5% more profit sharing on 14% less earnings to look forward to, a handful of additional F/Os will get trips bought off for line checks. The average narrow-body captain will make about $30k less this year than he would have with the TA.
If you vote no, do it with your eyes wide open to the very real possibility that it could take several years to get another TA. Good luck to you guys.
Your bashing of the reps that stood for the will of the group in no way improves the concession laden POS deal you brought us. The delay was due to the recall of an inept MEC and especially a hot headed chairman who resigned in shame. His last hurrah was to sell us out on scope compliance, creating prolonged incentive for management to continue to violate.
http://www.funnyonlinepictures.com/w...2013/01/47.png