Originally Posted by
Timbo
Yup, they were over reaching then, just like they did last July and are probably doing right now, trying to get us to pay for our own increases by giving up concessions in other areas, such as JV Scope, sick leave, higher ALV's, etc.
The company is today making unheard of profits, and still trying to sell us concessions as their "Operational Needs". The only need they have is a bigger truck to haul the Billions in our ongoing concessions, from the G.O. to Wall Street, as stock buybacks!
Until the company has fully restored our 2004 pay, and our 60% FAE DB plan, I am in NO MOOD to discuss their 'Operational Needs'.
Timbo
Honest question. What percentage of DC would be equitable to be equivalent to the 60% FAE?
Being that the DB isn't likely. I think (and we all know what opinions are like) that a 25% DC would be better as the money would be in our names and it already exists. More people could hit the max contribution limit earlier and excesses would still come to the individual after the limit was reached.
I have a DB and losing it would be total and complete BS from the SOBs.